Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Palmer Cravens, LLC et al v. Preferred Contractors Insurance Company Risk Retention Group, LLC
as 7:2023cv00361
Plaintiff:
Palmer Cravens, LLC and Estate of Guy Hardy as authorized by and through NORA FINLEY, the sole heir and representative doing business as Dripping Springs Roofing
Defendant:
Preferred Contractors Insurance Company Risk Retention Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Cravens et al v. State Farm Lloyds
as 4:2021cv02628
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Cravens and Janice Cravens
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cravens et al v. GEICO County Mutual Insurance Company
as 4:2021cv00083
Defendant:
GEICO County Mutual Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Gary Cravens and Luvenia Cravens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cravener v. Ridgeway
as 4:2019cv04289
Defendant:
Kali A. Ridgeway
Plaintiff:
Janet Cravener
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Gutierrez et al v. Wade Pennington & Sons, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00191
Plaintiff:
Daniel Celestino Lopez, Rafael Lopez, Abel Becerra and others
Defendant:
Allen Craven, Wade Pennington, Amanda Segura and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Manuel v. The State Of Texas
as 4:2018cv02434
Plaintiff:
Eddie - Tyrone: Manuel
Defendant:
The State Of Texas, Judge Angela Elisabeth Ellis, Lori Rocha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craven v. Kirk
as 4:2017cv03051
Petitioner:
Frederick Maurice Craven
Respondent:
Chris Kirk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Craven v. Kirk
as 4:2017cv02995
Petitioner:
Frederick Maurice Craven
Respondent:
Kris Kirk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00795
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Goodwin v. City of Texas City Texas
as 3:2014cv00090
Defendant:
City of Texas City Texas
Plaintiff:
William Goodwin , Darren Allen , John Thorn and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
