Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Sharp v. City of Houston et al
as 4:2024cv02045
Plaintiff:
Shanice Sharp
Defendant:
City of Houston, Pamela French, Courts and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Sharp v. Ervin
as 3:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Sharp, III
Defendant:
Elijah Michael Ervin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sharp v. Allied Security
as 4:2024cv01975
Plaintiff:
Shanice Sharp
Defendant:
Allied Security
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Sharp v. Zurich American Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv01213
Plaintiff:
Conrad Sharp
Defendant:
Zurich American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Brown v. Rikard et al
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Kereshe Brown
Defendant:
JP Gregory L. Rikard, Clerk Beverly Neumann, Rick Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sharp v. 10 Roads Express, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
David Sharp
Defendant:
10 Roads Express, LLC and John Elder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Blanton v. Sharp et al
as 4:2023cv04767
Plaintiff:
Billy C Blanton
Defendant:
Lynn Sharp, Amber Ochoa, William J Wheat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanton v. Sharp et al
as 4:2023cv03212
Plaintiff:
Billy C Blanton
Defendant:
Lynn Sharp and Terrel Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharpe v. Lyft, Inc.
as 4:2022cv04336
Plaintiff:
Pamela Sharpe
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc. and Flexdrive Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Sharpe v. PAM Rehabilitation Hospital of Clear Lake - South Campus, LLC
as 4:2022cv02680
Plaintiff:
Mrs. Erin Sharpe
Defendant:
PAM Rehabilitation Hospital of Clear Lake and PAM Rehabilitation Hospital of Clear Lake - South Campus, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
