Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Cato et al v. City of Houston et al
as 4:2023cv03735
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Cato and Christopher Alan Cato
Defendant:
CITY OF HOUSTON, HOUSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, Allstate Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Ben v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv04033
Plaintiff:
Cato Ben and Ben Cato
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Howard v. Davis et al
as 4:2018cv02436
Petitioner:
Talbot Howard
Respondent:
Lorie Davis and J Catoe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cato v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice Correctional Institutions Division
as 3:2017cv00293
Plaintiff:
Tina M Cato
Defendant:
Texas Department Of Criminal Justice Correctional Institutions Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. Grievance Department Officials (All) et al
as 2:2017cv00142
Plaintiff:
George Bay Barnes
Defendant:
Grievance Department Officials (All), Law Library Officials (All), Head Warden Catoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Choyce v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2016cv00241
Petitioner:
Charles Ricky Choyce, Jr.
Respondent:
Jeffrey W. Catoe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dunn et al v. Catoe et al
as 4:2015cv02269
Plaintiff:
Shawn L. Dunn, Khaliq Mehmood and Robin L. Jackson
Defendant:
Jefferey Catoe, Stuart Calhoun, John Becraft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee et al v. Emeritus Corporation
as 1:2014cv00157
Plaintiff:
Delton E Lee , Clayton R Lee and Donna Lee Cato
Defendant:
Emeritus Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cato v. Household Finance Corporation
as 4:2014cv00121
Plaintiff:
Thresa Cato
Defendant:
Household Finance Corporation and Household Finance Corporation III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cato v. Stephens
as 3:2013cv00310
Petitioner:
Richard Nathaniel Cato
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
