Cases 1 - 10 of 1,231
Otero v. Haftopulos et al
as 4:2024cv02147
Plaintiff:
Chantel Otero
Defendant:
Christopher Allen Haftopulos and B R Williams Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Bey v. State of Texas
as 4:2024cv01929
Plaintiff:
Antoine Davis Bey
Defendant:
State of Texas and Christopher G Morales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Mosley v. PPH Mortgage Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv01690
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jerome Lance Mosley
Defendant:
PPH Mortgage Corporation, Dutch Mill MHP LLC, AAMES Funding Corporation, DBA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Havens v. Chapa et al
as 2:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dale Havens
Defendant:
Amando Chapa, Corporal Fincher, Appel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shull v. Harrell
as 3:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shull
Defendant:
Scott Harrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DeYoung v. Conner et al
as 4:2024cv01580
Plaintiff:
Executor Anna DeYoung
Defendant:
James Christopher Conner, Conner and Associates LLC d/b/a Franchise Marketing Systems, Greg Rondinelli and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Isidienu v. UST General Contracting LLC et al
as 4:2024cv01284
Plaintiff:
Andrew Isidienu
Defendant:
UST General Contracting LLC, Christopher Roach, Lisa Wagley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
