Cases 1 - 10 of 710
Walls v. McCullough et al
as 4:2024cv02284
Defendant:
Mr. Patrick McCullough, Mr. Donald Marcus, Masters Mates & Pilots Pension Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01970
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Choke Canyon Motel, Inc. v. City of Port Aransas et al
as 2:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Choke Canyon Motel, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Port Aransas, David Parsons, Adams . Rick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jakeway v. Schneider et al
as 4:2024cv01090
Defendant:
Lawrence M. Schneider, Laurence M. Schneider, Adam N. Schneider and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Donald Jakeway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Jakeway v. Schneider et al
as 4:2024mc00442
Defendant:
Lawrence M. Schneider, Laurence M. Schneider, Adam N. Schneider and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Donald Jakeway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
McCray v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00917
Petitioner:
Donald McCray
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Herod v. Warden Amunet;
as 2:2024cv00014
Petitioner:
Donald Wayne Herod
Respondent:
Warden Amunet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Herod v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00190
Petitioner:
Donald Wayne Herod
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. Trump
as 4:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Donald John Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
