Cases 1 - 10 of 214
Murphy v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01262
Petitioner:
John Eldridge Murphy
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Rigsby
as 4:2024cv00924
Plaintiff:
Jacob Earl Murphy
Defendant:
Bobby Rigsby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURPHY, JR. v. ESSILORLUXOTTICA USA INC. et al
as 4:2024cv00801
Plaintiff:
HARVEY EUGENE MURPHY, JR.
Defendant:
ESSILORLUXOTTICA USA INC., LUXOTTICA OF AMERICA INC., LUXOTTICA RETAIL NORTH AMERICA INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Murphy v. Brumley et al
as 4:2024cv00525
Plaintiff:
Jacob Earl Murphy
Defendant:
Caleb Brumley, Anothony Newton and Bobby D Rigsby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Newton et al
as 4:2024cv00438
Plaintiff:
Jacob Earl Murphy
Defendant:
Anthony J. Newton, Bobby D. Rigsby and Caleb Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. I.R.S.
as 4:2023cv04654
Plaintiff:
Gregory Earl Murphy, Sr. and Sh
Defendant:
I.R.S.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Galpin
as 4:2023cv04000
Plaintiff:
Lauren Marie Murphy
Defendant:
Andrew Galpin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Murphy v. Robinson et al
as 3:2023cv00339
Plaintiff:
Ryan Albert Murphy
Defendant:
Jared Robinson, Mark Stevens, Dr. FNU Gallagow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George et al v. Abbott et al
as 4:2023cv03609
Plaintiff:
Darresha George, Darryl George and Darresha G.
Defendant:
Justice Greg Abbott, Ken Paxton, Barbers Hill Independant School District and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hendrix v. Clark et al
as 4:2023cv03316
Plaintiff:
Jennifer K. Hendrix
Defendant:
Clayton Clark, Scott Love, Shelley Hutson and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
