Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Tatum v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04025
Petitioner:
Steven Tatum
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tatum v. Express, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv03209
Plaintiff:
Kraig Tatum
Defendant:
Ranger Express, LLC and Tom Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Tatum v. Parrish et al
as 4:2023cv02873
Plaintiff:
Steven Tatum
Defendant:
Officer Parrish, Judge Don Strickland and Houston Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry et al v. People of the State of Texas et al
as 4:2021cv02006
Defendant:
Deputy Corley Weatherford, DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Texas Hopkins County and others
Plaintiff:
Steve Perry, Texas Gamefowl Breeders Association, Jose Salas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Bell et al v. Continental Production Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv01654
Plaintiff:
Idell Bell and Rashard Tatum
Defendant:
Craig Corbell and CONTINENTAL PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Romero et al v. Tatum et al
as 1:2020cv00006
Plaintiff:
Hector Castillo and Alma Romero
Defendant:
C.R. England, Inc. and Corey Terrell Tatum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Owens v. Lykos et al
as 4:2018cv00689
Plaintiff:
Theron G Owens
Defendant:
Pat Lykos, Kim Ogg, Marlon Tatum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Wagner et al
as 4:2017cv01361
Plaintiff:
Stanley Joe Powell
Defendant:
Charles Wagner, Jeri Yenne, Brazoria County et al and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
