Cases 131 - 140 of 19,671
Emmett v. Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 1:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Barry Emmett
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, Comissary, TDCJ and all mailing employees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez Dominguez v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00411
Petitioner:
Gabino Hernandez Dominguez
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Krueger v. Collier
as 5:2024cv00396
Petitioner:
Kent Anthony Krueger
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wheelock v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00416
Petitioner:
Scott Ralph Wheelock
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Krueger v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00417
Petitioner:
Kent Anthony Krueger
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Krueger v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00418
Petitioner:
Kent Anthony Krueger
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hollenbeck v. Lange
as 6:2024cv00201
Petitioner:
Tae Hollenbeck
Defendant:
State of Texas
Respondent:
Sheriff Eddy Lange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mojica v. Jirasek et al
as 1:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Dean Anthony Mojica
Defendant:
Blake Jirasek, Brian Connolly, Dee McWilliams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Pratt et al
as 6:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Tracy Lynn Jackson
Defendant:
Mark Pratt and Darbie Bowman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Milam County et al
as 6:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Kevin Martin
Defendant:
Milam County Jail, Capt FNU Knaus and Milam County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
