Cases 91 - 100 of 784
Winkelman v. Austin Police Department et al
as 1:2022cv00875
Plaintiff:
Eli Winkelman
Defendant:
Austin Police Department, City Of Austin, Ryan Herring and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Edwards v. Merit Logistics, LLC
as 5:2022cv00837
Plaintiff:
Brittany Edwards
Defendant:
Merit Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00704
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gonzalez v. Homeward Mortgage LLC
as 1:2022cv00686
Plaintiff:
Edward Gonzalez
Defendant:
Homeward Mortgage LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Carter v. Torres, et al.
as 5:2022cv00722
Plaintiff:
Ellery Carter
Defendant:
John Edward Torres, et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. United States of America
as 6:2022cv00765
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Turner, III
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Volter-Jones v. City Of Austin et al
as 1:2022cv00511
Plaintiff:
Ge'Micah Volter-Jones
Defendant:
City Of Austin, Edward Boudreau and Derrick Lehman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edward Bravenec, et al. v. Martin
as 5:2022cv00522
Plaintiff:
Edward Bravenec, et al.
Defendant:
Rowland J. Martin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Walker v. Gauntt et al
as 6:2022cv00507
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Walker
Defendant:
Judge John Gauntt, Judge Jack Jones, Judge Caril Staritt-Burnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
