Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Rodriguez v. San Antonio Police Department et al
as 5:2014cv00752
Defendant:
Phillip Bourcier, Kimberly Kory, San Antonio Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
David Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salinas v. Livingston
as 5:2014cv00075
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Brad Livingston
Petitioner:
David Rodriguez Salinas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Spencer et al
as 5:2011cv01033
Defendant:
Honorable David Peeples, Sylvia R. Rodriguez, Richard Barrera Siller and others
210) 434-8773 (fax:
David Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Sandoval
as 5:2011cv00951
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
David Rodriguez Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized Publication and Use of Communication
Rodriguez v. GEO Group Central Texas Facility et al
as 5:2011cv00261
Defendant:
FNU Baladeras, Brent Bemont, GEO Central Texas Facility Medical Doctor/Staff and others
Plaintiff:
David Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Zwicke et al
as 5:2011cv00260
Defendant:
Robert Hernandez, D. Irwin, C. Kent and others
Plaintiff:
David Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salinas v. Texas Parole Board
as 5:2010cv00984
Petitioner:
David Rodriguez Salinas
Respondent:
Texas Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Casey v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2009cv00337
Plaintiff:
Travis Casey
Defendant:
David Rodriguez and The City of Austin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Salinas v. Quarterman
as 5:2007cv00997
Petitioner:
David Rodriguez Salinas
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
