Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Cardenas v. Valentine & Kebartas, LLC et al
as 5:2020cv00300
Defendant:
Valentine & Kebartas, LLC, Resurgent Capital Services, LP, John and Jane Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Gloria Cardenas
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv01416
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Reposa v. Chody et al
as 1:2019cv01110
Plaintiff:
Adam T. Reposa
Defendant:
Robert Chody, Nicole Warren, Williamson County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Marvin Montgomery, et al v. H.E. Butt Grocery Company, et al
as 5:2019cv01063
Plaintiff:
Marvin Montgomery and Francisco Meza
Defendant:
H-E-B Savings & Retirement Plan Investment & Administration Committee, H.E. Butt Grocery Company and John and Jane Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Myart v. City of San Antonio, et al
as 5:2019cv00702
Defendant:
City of San Antonio, Employees of John Does Security Company, Baptist Hospital System and others
Plaintiff:
James W. Myart, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00536
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00169
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Stein et al v. Navient Solutions, LLC, et al
as 1:2017cv00907
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1-10 and Navient Solutions, LLC
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Stein, Leah Stein and Loren Stein
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 - Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Stallings v. Chavez et al
as 6:2017cv00123
Defendant:
City of Waco, Manuel Chavez, John or Jane Doe 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
James Edward Stallings, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
