Cases 11 - 20 of 234
Godwin v. Godwin et al
as 1:2022cv01263
Plaintiff:
Heather Elizabeth Godwin
Defendant:
Glyn J. Godwin, Gerard Ruth, Charles Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Guillory Jr v. Bexar County Jail
as 5:2022cv01005
Plaintiff:
Ronald Guillory Jr
Defendant:
Bexar County Jail, Javier Salazar, Gregory M. Ruhnke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gokey v. Economidy et al
as 5:2022cv00986
Plaintiff:
Robert Wade Gokey
Defendant:
John M. Economidy, Mary D. Roman, Rita Spiegel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Lumpkin
as 5:2022cv00759
Petitioner:
Calvin Reed
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reed v. Kijakazi
as 5:2022cv00539
Plaintiff:
Brittany Nicole Reed
Defendant:
Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Coaster v. James et al
as 6:2022cv00458
Petitioner:
Keitrick Dewayne Coaster
Defendant:
Jeff James, Beth Toben, Stephen Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ybarra v. Reed et al
as 1:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
Ms Jazmin Nina Ybarra and Jazmin Nina Ybarra
Defendant:
Marcus Reed and City Of Austin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Callier v. Processing.Direct, LLC. et al
as 3:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Brandon Callier
Defendant:
Processing.Direct, LLC., Bryan Reed, Debt Pay, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
