Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Clancey et al v. Gillespie County et al
as 1:2012cv01139
Plaintiff:
Anne Clancey, Sandra L. Keyser and Michael Schroeder
Defendant:
Gillespie County, Gillespie County Sheriff's Department, Sheriff Buddy Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00236
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00399
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Notice Only Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
512:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Saenz et al v. Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB et al
as 1:2011cv00080
Defendant:
Aurora Loan Services, LLC, Faslo Solutions, John Does 1-100 and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Saenz and Shannon Saenz
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Saenz et al v. Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB et al
as 1:2009cv00732
Plaintiff:
Marcus Saenz and Shannon Saenz
Defendant:
Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Aurora Loan Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Ayers et al v. BNSF Railway Company
as 1:2009cv00414
Plaintiff:
Robert Ayers, Jill Ayers, John Baker and others
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Huot et al v. Dolgencorp of Texas, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00903
Plaintiff:
Shantea Huot, Shantea Huot, Victoria Schroeder and others
Defendant:
Dolgencorp of Texas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jackson v. State of Texas et al
as 6:2008cv00267
Plaintiff:
Barbara Jackson
Defendant:
State of Texas, Lavita Knox, Maria Moyers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
