Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Khan v. Lynch et al
as 3:2016cv00018
Respondent:
J. Armendariz, Jeh Johnson, Loretta Lynch and others
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Petitioner:
Shahab Habib Khan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Khan v. Johnson et al
as 3:2015cv00392
Respondent:
Alfredo Campos, Jeh Johnson, Loretta Lynch and others
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Petitioner:
Ain Foor Khan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rovio Entertainment, Ltd. v. GW Trading LLC et al
as 5:2013cv01079
Defendant:
Amaar Habib Inc., Amin Habib Inc., Ariahabib Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Rovio Entertainment, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Lee-Khan v. Austin Independent School District et al
as 1:2013cv00147
Defendant:
Austin Independent School District, Jane Doe and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Helen Lee-Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Khan et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2011cv00134
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Farzana Khan and Mohammad Khan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Davila et al v. USA et al
as 3:2010cv00366
Defendant:
Phil Basak, Unknown Brewster County Sheriff Deputies, Iftikhar Khan and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Davila and Marcela C. Duarte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ramos v. KAM Restaurants, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00108
Defendant:
KAM Restaurants, Inc. and Masood Khan
Plaintiff:
Jose Ramos
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Khan et al v. Honda Motor Co., Ltd. et al
as 5:2007cv00576
Plaintiff:
Faraz Khan, Muhammad Hamza Khan and Bilquis Vardag
Defendant:
Honda Motor Co., Ltd., Honda Research and Development Co., Ltd., American Honda Motor Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
