Cases 21 - 30 of 89
Lawson v. Segura et al
as 5:2018cv00735
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Lawson
Defendant:
The City of San Antonio Police Department, Officer FNU Segura and Unknown (SAPD) Bike Patrol Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson v. Cowan et al
as 1:2018cv00312
Defendant:
Claiborne Cowan, HQ U.S. Army Coprs of Engineers and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Division
Plaintiff:
Alice Lawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00029
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lawson v. Morrison et al
as 1:2017cv01001
Plaintiff:
Alice Lawson
Defendant:
Scott Morrison and Oaks, Hartline & Daly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Roberts v. Mnuchin
as 1:2017cv00915
Defendant:
Steven Mnuchin
Plaintiff:
Lawson P. Roberts
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Samuel et al v. Frazier
as 6:2016cv00464
Plaintiff:
Zachary Bias, Andre Frank C., R. Contreras and others
Defendant:
Riyon Derrell Frazier, Sui Juris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Discrimination
Lawson v. Lew
as 1:2016cv01272
Plaintiff:
Lawson P. Roberts
Defendant:
Jacob J. Lew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv01011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans with Disabilities Act
Lawson, Jr. v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC
as 5:2016cv00916
Plaintiff:
Bernard Lawson, Jr.
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00096
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
