Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Mitchell v. Norris
as 1:2012cv01158
Plaintiff:
Idella Mitchell
Defendant:
Attorney Randolph Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tanknology Inc. v. Lant et al
as 1:2012cv00690
Defendant:
Donald Lant, Mary Anne Lant and Treon, Aguirre, Newman & Norris
Plaintiff:
Tanknology Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00233
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Kelly v. Trevino et al
as 5:2010cv00968
Defendant:
Raymond Almendarez, Matt Barber, Sandra Castenada and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cornett v. Midland County et al
as 7:2010cv00122
Respondent:
Detective Manuel Beltran, Lupe Duran, Midland County and others
Petitioner:
Norris Cornett, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cornett v. Nelson
as 7:2010cv00123
Petitioner:
Norris Cornett, Jr.
Respondent:
Ruby Charles Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cornett v. Sellers, et al
as 7:2010cv00115
Petitioner:
Norris Cornett, Jr.
Respondent:
Midland County Jail, Officer Price, Officer Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cornett v. Thaler
as 7:2010cv00107
Petitioner:
Norris Cornett, Jr.
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Norwood et al
as 7:2010cv00003
Plaintiff:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc. and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Defendant:
James K. Norwood, Maurice Meyer, III and John R. Norris, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Grimsley v. Faulkner et al
as 3:2009cv00396
Plaintiff:
Glen Grimsley and Glen Grimsley
Defendant:
John M. Faulkner, Edward Martinez, Mario M. Padilla and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1340 Recovery of Erroneous Refund
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
