Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Cases 31 - 40 of 89
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00061
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans with Disabilities Act
Lawson v. Stephens et al
as 5:2015cv01089
Defendant: Access to Courts Director, Christopher Brantly, Custodian of Offender Records and others
Plaintiff: Paul Eugene Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv01015
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00560
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00559
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00561
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv00481
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lawson v. Freescale Semiconductor, Ltd et al
as 1:2015cv00360
Defendant: Krishnan Balasubramanian, Chinh E. Chu, D. Mark Durcan and others
Plaintiff: Eric Lawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367 - Deceptive Trade Practices Act
Lawson v. Ramos
as 5:2014cv00997
Plaintiff: Ricardo Lawson
Defendant: Felipe Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00182
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans with Disabilities Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?