Cases 31 - 40 of 72
Lovett v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2016cv01243
Defendant:
County of Travis and State of Texas
Plaintiff:
Lamar Lovett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. United States of America
as 7:2016cv00371
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Detwaune Lamar Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lovett v. Davis
as 1:2016cv01186
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Lamar Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lovett v. Davis
as 5:2016cv01032
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Lamar Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv00719
Petitioner:
Quincy Lamar Alexander
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sawyer v. Roberts et al
as 1:2016cv00448
Defendant:
US Senator John Cornyn, US Senator Ted Cruz, Dana DeBeauvoir and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Sawyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Sellers v. Officer Adams
as 6:2016cv00064
Defendant:
Officer FNU Adams
Plaintiff:
Corey Lamar Sellers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00315
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans with Disabilities Act
Barnes v. Stephens
as 6:2016cv00022
Petitioner:
Reginal Lamar Barnes
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00976
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
