Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Williams v. Mayes et al
as 1:2012cv01002
Defendant:
C. Mayes and M. Pearson
Plaintiff:
Franklin L. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trejo v. Service Tech, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00531
Counter Plaintiff:
Chris Pearson and Service Tech, Inc.
Defendant:
Chris Pearson and Service Tech, Inc.
Counter Defendant:
Juan Trejo
Plaintiff:
Juan Trejo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
NCS Pearson, Inc. v. LearningStation.com, Inc.
as 5:2012cv00151
Defendant:
LearningStation.com, Inc.
Plaintiff:
NCS Pearson, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Fragozo, Jr. v. Pearson
as 5:2011cv00330
Petitioner:
Conrad Fragozo, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Bruce Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00632
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
City of Alpine Tx. et al v. Abbott et al
as 4:2009cv00059
Plaintiff:
City of Alpine Tx., City of Alpine Tx., City of Alpine Tx. and others
Defendant:
Greg Abbott and State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NCS Pearson, Inc. v. Castle Rock Research
as 5:2009cv00065
Plaintiff:
NCS Pearson, Inc. and NCS Pearson, Inc.
Defendant:
Castle Rock Research and Castle Rock Research
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Rivers v. Pearson
as 1:2008cv00543
Plaintiff:
Johnny Paul Rivers
Defendant:
Louise Pearson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
