Cases 31 - 40 of 86
Robles v. The State of Texas et al
as 5:2017cv01017
Defendant:
Sally Alba, Officer J. Diel, Chief William McManus and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Robles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robles v. Davis
as 6:2017cv00173
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Christopher Shannon Robles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Callaway v. City of Austin et al
as 1:2015cv00103
Plaintiff:
Callaway and Caroline Callaway
Defendant:
City of Austin, Travis County, Patrick Oborski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robles v. Willis
as 3:2017cv00088
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Petitioner:
Luis Daniel Robles
Respondent:
J. Scott Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gegenheimer v. Stevenson et al
as 1:2016cv01270
Defendant:
Mary Abbott Martin, Rehan Alimohammad, Christy Amuny and others
Plaintiff:
Greg Gegenheimer
Amicu:
Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robles-Torres v. Untied States of America
as 3:2016cv00384
Petitioner:
Silvestre Raul Robles-Torres
Respondent:
Untied States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Robles v. USA
as 2:2016cv00104
Petitioner:
Edwin Robles
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Martinez, Jr. et al v. Davis et al
as 3:2016cv00156
Defendant:
Johnny Lee Davis and Liberty Lines, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Victor R. Martinez, Jr., Christian Munoz and Jose Robles, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Alvarado Jimenez et al v. Price
as 3:2016cv00092
Plaintiff:
Sergio Alvarado Jimenez, Roman Luis Baltazar, Saul Bustos Lorzo and others
Notice Only Party:
Gary L. Anderson and Magdalena Jara
Defendant:
Corey Price
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
