Cases 71 - 80 of 81
Flores v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incoporated
as 5:2009cv00788
Plaintiff:
Juan Alvaro Flores
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incoporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Pierce v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 6:2009cv00190
Plaintiff:
Alvon Pierce
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Medina v. Sanderson Farms, Inc. et al
as 6:2009cv00039
Plaintiff:
Lita Medina
Defendant:
Sanderson Farms, Inc., Sanderson Farms, Inc., Sanderson Farms, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Pierce v. Mukasey
as 6:2007cv00400
Petitioner:
Jackie Leroy Pierce
Respondent:
Michael B. Mukasey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Quinones v. Pierce Manufacturing, Inc.
as 3:2007cv00432
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Quinones
Defendant:
Pierce Manufacturing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Mason v. Grounds et al
as 6:2007cv00379
Plaintiff:
Jake Mason
Defendant:
Dawn Grounds, Exquio Garza, Kenneth Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Jailer Unknown Party
as 6:2007cv00362
Plaintiff:
Keith Andrew Pierce
Defendant:
Jailer Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Kingrey et al
as 6:2007cv00311
Plaintiff:
Keith Andrew Pierce
Defendant:
Sherry Kingrey and Sherri Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Doe et al
as 1:2007cv00776
Plaintiff:
Rodger Pierce
Defendant:
John Doe, 1, John Doe, 2 and John Doe, 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Quarterman
as 6:2007cv00205
Petitioner:
Keith Andrew Pierce
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
