Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Williams v. Burleson County, Texas et al
as 1:2023cv01368
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cordell Williams
Defendant:
Burleson County, Texas, Gene Hermes, Judge Reva L. Townslee Corbett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Patterson et al
as 6:2023cv00498
Plaintiff:
Larry Chevey Miller
Defendant:
FNU Patterson, Off. FNU Burleson, FNU Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burleson v. The Township of Coolidge, Texas
as 6:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Samuel Burleson
Defendant:
The Township of Coolidge, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burleson v. Lumpkin
as 6:2023cv00020
Petitioner:
Samuel Jedediah Burleson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burleson v. U.S. Department of Agriculture
as 6:2022cv01294
Plaintiff:
Samuel Jedediah Burleson
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Claim Against the United States
Williams v. Burleson County, Texas et al
as 1:2022cv00750
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cordell Williams
Defendant:
Burleson County, Texas, Burleson County Board of County Commissioner's Court, Gene Hermes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burleson v. United State of America
as 6:2022cv00660
Plaintiff:
Samuel Jedidiah Burleson
Defendant:
United State of America
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 946 Complaint in Condemnation - Eminent Domain
Burleson v. The State of Texas et al
as 6:2022cv00329
Plaintiff:
Samuel Jedidiah Burleson
Defendant:
The State of Texas and Williamson County, TX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burleson v. Synergy Post Logistics, LLC
as 6:2022mc00333
Plaintiff:
Samuel Jedidiah Burleson
Defendant:
Synergy Post Logistics, LLC
Burleson v. Pace et al
as 1:2021cv00857
Plaintiff:
Samuel Jedediah Burleson
Defendant:
Jeffrey Pace, Waco DPO-IV, Stephon Lightener and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
