Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Shelton v. Correct Care Solutions
as 6:2022cv00781
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Shelton
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Correct Care Solutions
as 5:2022cv00708
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Shelton
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathews v. Corrective Care Solutions et al
as 6:2022cv00353
Plaintiff:
Danny R. Mathews
Defendant:
J. Brandon, R. Deberhah, Bell County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Correct Care Solutions
as 6:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Walker
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Correct Care Solutions
as 5:2021cv01205
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Walker
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Correct Care Solutions
as 6:2021cv01293
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Walker
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holloway v. Alan et al
as 6:2019cv00722
Defendant:
Dr. FNU Alan, Correct Care Solutions, Well Path and others
Plaintiff:
Darrel G Holloway, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Bell County Jail et al
as 5:2018cv00285
Plaintiff:
Johnny Bailey, Jr.
Defendant:
Bell County Jail, Bell County Jail Administrator, Correct Care Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cardiel v. Lange et al
as 6:2017cv00292
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Cardiel
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, County of Bell, TX and Sheriff Eddie Lange
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garay et al v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv00737
Defendant:
Russell Amaru, Gary Ray Austin, Correct Care Solutions, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Alvara Garay and Indalecio Garay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
