Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Moses v. Armstrong et al
as 6:2023cv00647
Petitioner:
DeAngelo Donte Moses
Respondent:
Bruce Armstrong and Jerry Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Swindle v. Vasquez et al
as 1:2021cv00955
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Cortez Swindle
Defendant:
Sheila Vasquez and Steven McCraw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Flanery et al
as 1:2020cv01217
Defendant:
Justin Flanery, Art Acevedo and Austin Police Department
Plaintiff:
Jeron Deangelo Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swindle v. USA
as 6:2020cv00379
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Cortez Swindle
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Swindle v. USA
as 6:2018cv00300
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Deangelo Cortez Swindle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Swindle v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 6:2017cv00127
Petitioner:
Deangelo Cortez Swindle
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Suggs et al v. Express Courier International, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00275
Plaintiff:
Chris Averette, Joshua Burrus, Traci Calbert and others
Defendant:
EMP LSO Holding Corporation and Express Courier International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
DeAngelo v. Colvin
as 6:2016cv00156
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Tammy Lynn DeAngelo
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Smith v. United States Of America
as 3:2015cv00299
Petitioner:
Deangelo Perry Smith
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
