Cases 1 - 10 of 128
Knight v. Independant Oil Field et al
as 7:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Joshua Knight
Defendant:
Independant Oil Field, Mary Pena and Tony B.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kindred v. Texas Parole Board et al
as 6:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Herman Lee Kindred
Defendant:
Texas Parole Board, Temple, Texas Parole Office, Field Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortega v. Fields et al
as 5:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Ortega
Defendant:
Daniel Gilbert Fields and Eric Doe
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
LINFO IP, LLC v. Mrs. Fields Gifting and Licensing, LLC
as 7:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
LINFO IP, LLC
Defendant:
Mrs. Fields Gifting and Licensing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Freeman v. TDCJ-Director-CID et al
as 5:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Antonio Freeman
Defendant:
TDCJ-Director-CID, FBI Field Office, Lincoln Heritage Life Insurant Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Tanner v. Reliant Field Services, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Holden Tanner
Defendant:
Reliant Field Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Fredrick v. Artificial Intelligence Fields
as 1:2023cv01149
Plaintiff:
Darion Dion Fredrick
Defendant:
Artificial Intelligence Fields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
