Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Carter v. Torres, et al.
as 5:2022cv00722
Plaintiff:
Ellery Carter
Defendant:
John Edward Torres, et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reichmuth v. United States of America
as 5:2021cv00683
Petitioner:
John Edward Reichmuth
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Bastrop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Reichmuth v. United States of America
as 5:2020cv00369
Plaintiff:
John Edward Reichmuth
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Holmes v. Davis
as 7:2017cv00124
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
John Edward Holmes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Foddrill v. Castro et al
as 5:2013cv00051
Defendant:
Diego M. Bernal, City Attorney Michael Bernard, Leticia Cantu and others
Plaintiff:
John Edward Foddrill, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Garza v. Does 1 through 30
as 5:2012cv00160
Defendant:
Does 1 through 30 and Medical Dental Hospital Burial of San Antonio Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Edward Garza
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Garza v. National Credit Systems, Inc.
as 5:2012cv00159
Plaintiff:
John Edward Garza
Defendant:
National Credit Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Garza v. Franklin Collection Service, Inc.
as 5:2012cv00162
Defendant:
Franklin Collection Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Edward Garza
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Garza v. Healthcare Funding Solution, LLC
as 5:2012cv00161
Plaintiff:
John Edward Garza
Defendant:
Healthcare Funding Solution, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Soto v. Thaler
as 5:2011cv00892
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
John Edward Soto, II
Respondent:
Director Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
