Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Barcenas et al v. McCraw et al
as 1:2022cv00397
Plaintiff:
Erasto Barcenas, Melvin Amador Rodas, Ivan Ruano Nava and others
Defendant:
Steven C. McCraw, Greg Abbott, Bryan Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jose Lopez, et al v. Ovintiv USA Inc., et al
as 5:2020cv00483
Plaintiff:
Jose Lopez and Guadalupe Lopez
Defendant:
Ovintiv USA Inc. f/k/a Encana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lopez v. United States of America et al
as 7:2018cv00207
Defendant:
John Doe #4, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Treaty Transfer
as 3:2016mc00401
In Re:
Jesus Octavio Arreola Beltran, Alex Ruben Arroyo Gomez, Raul Carbajal Padilla and others
Defendant:
Treaty Transfer
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00054
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. The Roy Benavidez-Robert Patterson All Airborne Chapter et al
as 3:2014cv00349
Defendant:
Nathaniel Ford, Jose Lopez, The Roy Benavidez-Robert Patterson All Airborne Chapter and others
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Lopez et al v. Housing Authority City of El Paso
as 3:2012cv00256
Plaintiff:
Jose A. Codina, Mary Beth Dondiego, Jose Lopez and others
Defendant:
Housing Authority City of El Paso
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Quintero v. United States of America
as 5:2009cv00940
Plaintiff:
Jose Lopez Quintero
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00592
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
