Cases 101 - 110 of 205
Williams v. Hatchett et al
as 2:2013cv00685
Plaintiff:
Anthony R. Williams
Defendant:
T.D. Hatchett, Mrs. Johnson and H.R.R.J. Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wililams v. Hampton Roads Regional Medical Dept. et al
as 2:2013cv00684
Plaintiff:
Anthony R. Williams
Defendant:
Hampton Roads Regional Medical Dept., Major Hatchett and Dr. Kolongo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HALLUMS v. ARTHUR et al
as 1:2013cv01256
Plaintiff:
Theresa Hallums
Defendant:
Beth Arthur, Carmen Williams and Official/Office Of The Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail et al
as 1:2013cv00745
Plaintiff:
Darrell W. Williams
Defendant:
Hampton Roads Regional Jail, Newport News City Jail and Dr. Klongo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Taylor et al
as 2:2013cv00286
Plaintiff:
Clinton L. Wilson
Defendant:
R. Taylor, A. Dugger and R. H. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Prince William Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2013cv00573
Plaintiff:
Keith Daniel Williams
Defendant:
Prince William Adult Detention Center and Prince William Adult Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Hearn et al
as 3:2013cv00139
Plaintiff:
Percell Williams
Defendant:
Hearn, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. McRay et al
as 2:2013cv00056
Plaintiff:
Caleb Williams
Defendant:
Mr. McRay and Mr. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canada v. Rountree et al
as 2:2013cv00013
Plaintiff:
Kelvin A. Canada
Defendant:
Lt. Rountree, William C. Lane, Capt. Whitehead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Vogt et al
as 3:2012cv00875
Plaintiff:
Bruce Williams
Defendant:
Vogt and McNeil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
