Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Kennedy v. Williams
as 2:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kennedy
Defendant:
Cpl Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennedy v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kennedy
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mouring v. Daniels et al
as 2:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Layne Mouring
Defendant:
Captain Daniels, Captain Jones, Lieutenant Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Medical Unit et al
as 2:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Daniel Scott Campbell
Defendant:
Medical Unit, Officer Freeman and Sgt Copeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Richmond City Justice Center et al
as 2:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Daniel Scott Campbell
Defendant:
Richmond City Justice Center, Officer Tylor and Officer Mertaugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamm v. United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Kevin Allen Lamm
Defendant:
United States of America, Mr. McCrae, Ms. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sweeting v. Mack et al
as 2:2023cv00679
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Sweeting
Defendant:
Captain Mack, Captain Bagwrath, Captain Finley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel v. Coles et al
as 2:2023cv00435
Plaintiff:
Jazzman L. Daniel
Defendant:
Coles, Sgt. K. Boyd, Sgt. McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Loudoun County Sheriff Office et al
as 2:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Daniel Nathaniel Davis and Darren Nathaniel Davis
Defendant:
Loudoun County Sheriff Office, Kim Holway, David Wozniak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
