Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Boomer v. Novak et al
as 3:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
Bobby Boomer
Defendant:
R. Novak, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boyne v. Kincaid et al
as 1:2023cv00279
Plaintiff:
Paul Boyne
Defendant:
Stacey Kincaid, Matthew Cisler and John Doe, 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perkins v City of Norfolk, Police Officer Derek Proctor
as 2:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Eric Perkins
Defendant:
Derek Proctor, City of Norfolk, Police Officer Derek Proctor and John Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sealed Plaintiff 1 et al v. Front et al
as 3:2022cv00670
Plaintiff:
Doe 1, Doe 2, Sealed Plaintiff 1 and others
Defendant:
Patriot Front, Thomas Rousseau, Paul Gancarz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00731
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
WELLS v. FUENTES et al
as 1:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
CURTIS LEVAR WELLS, JR
Defendant:
JAVIER FUENTES, SCOTT WANEK, MICHAEL P ARMSTRONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tew v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail Authority et al
as 2:2021cv00641
Plaintiff:
Shane Matthew Tew
Defendant:
Hampton Roads Regional Jail Authority, Wellpath LLC, Correct Care Solutions, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stout et al v. Ofc. Barrow et al
as 3:2021cv00654
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Stout and Marc Stout
Defendant:
Ofc. Barrow, Ofc. Murphy, Ofc. Worley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
