Cases 11 - 20 of 310
Byrd v. Hamilton et al
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Byrd
Defendant:
Mr. T. Hamilton, John Does and Mr. Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Clarke et al
as 2:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
John David Anderson, III
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Leslie J. Fleming, Beth E. Cabell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
L.M. et al v. Graham et al
as 1:2023cv01574
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Defendant:
Jonathan Graham, Michelle Smith, John Doe #4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurst v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv00568
Plaintiff:
Stedroy Hurst
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, John Doe, Chadwick Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ali v. Tatum et al
as 3:2023cv00616
Plaintiff:
Abir Ali
Defendant:
Esker Lee Tatum and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Doe et al
as 2:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
John Thomas Hill
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv01210
Plaintiff:
Justin Clark
Defendant:
United States of America, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Hill v. Doe et al
as 2:2023cv00438
Plaintiff:
John T. Hill
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Northup v. City of Richmond et al
as 1:2023cv00992
Plaintiff:
David Joseph Northup
Defendant:
City of Richmond, Edward F. Jewett, Glenn Youngkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Defour v. McCoy et al
as 1:2023cv00987
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Defour
Defendant:
Warden McCoy, John Doe, Major Cain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
