Cases 41 - 50 of 286
Jamison v. Clarke, et al.
as 3:2022cv00492
Plaintiff:
Daniel William Jamison
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Mark Amonette, MD, Natarcha Gregg, M.S.A, RD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Garfield Allen et al
as 1:2022cv00659
Plaintiff:
John Edward Parker, Jr.
Defendant:
V Garfield Allen, R Daniels, Mayham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Jamison v. Clarke et al
as 3:2022cv00425
Plaintiff:
Daniel William Jamison
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, David Robinson, Mark Amonette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown et al v. Leu et al
as 1:2022cv00633
Plaintiff:
James W Brown, Matthew J Collins, Michael Vasquez and others
Defendant:
D. Leu, D. Smith, R. Carmona and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richmond v. White
as 1:2022cv00531
Petitioner:
Garth Daniel Richmond, II
Respondent:
Warden Rick White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conley v. Dr. Bhat et al
as 3:2022cv00371
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Conley
Defendant:
Dr. Bhat, Brandy Moon and PA Clemens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamison v. Herring et al
as 3:2022cv00360
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Jamison
Defendant:
Mark Herring, Richard Vorhis and Stacie Sessoms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burton v. Staff 70 Building C.O.S Stith et al
as 1:2022cv00422
Plaintiff:
Cordarius Denard Burton
Defendant:
Staff 70 Building C.O.S Stith, Ms. Walker and Ms. Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Clarke
as 1:2022cv00175
Petitioner:
Daniel Levern Smith
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gross v. Dudley
as 3:2021cv00805
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Gross
Defendant:
James R. Dudley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
