Cases 61 - 70 of 100
Wilson v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons
as 1:2012cv00319
Plaintiff:
Marlon Andre Wilson
Defendant:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Godbey v. Simmons et al
as 1:2011cv00704
Plaintiff:
Walter Thomas Godbey
Defendant:
Hubert Simmons, Federal Bureau Of Prisons, Paul J. Masterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyndall v. Responsible Medical Staff et al
as 1:2011cv00283
Plaintiff:
Dennis W. Tyndall
Defendant:
Responsible Medical Staff and Federal Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2011cv00070
Petitioner:
Murray Leon Smith
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, Harold Clarke, David A. Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sanders v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2010cv00800
Plaintiff:
Raymond Sanders
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, Piedmont Regional Jail and Earnest Tony
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Judd v. Lappin et al
as 1:2010cv00963
Petitioner:
Keith Russell Judd
Respondent:
Harley G. Lappin, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Attorney General of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mora v. Pastrana et al
as 2:2010cv00372
Petitioner:
Jose Jesus Mora
Respondent:
Jorge Pastrana and United States Goverment, Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2010cv00289
Plaintiff:
Sean Corey Jones
Defendant:
Richard Ramirez, Robert Ellis, Jeffrey Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Royer v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 1:2010cv00146
Plaintiff:
Randall Todd Royer
Defendant:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons and Unknown Federal Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
