Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Houchin v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 2:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
Nace Eugene Houchin, Jr.
Defendant:
Virginia Commonwealth of, Attorney General, James City County Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McSheffrey v. Powers et al
as 2:2023cv00071
Petitioner:
John P. McSheffrey
Respondent:
Paul J. Powers and Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Powers v. Blair et al
as 1:2021cv00496
Defendant:
Bigelow, Brinkley, Marx and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lee Powers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Snowden v. Rios et al
as 3:2019cv00042
Defendant:
Brandon Wrobleski, W. McMilliam Powers, M. Rios and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Lavonn Snowden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson/Power of Attorney Ramona Jackson v. Virginia Department of Corrections/Greensville Correctional Center
as 4:2018cv00098
Plaintiff:
William Jackson/Power of Attorney Ramona Jackson
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections/Greenville Correctional Center and Virginia Department of Corrections/Greensville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332
Daniels v. The United States et al
as 2:2016cv00210
Plaintiff:
John C. Daniels
Defendant:
The United States, Harrold Clark, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powers v. Bode Technology Lab
as 1:2016cv00328
Plaintiff:
Derwin Powers
Defendant:
Bode Technology Lab
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Lane et al
as 3:2014cv00613
Plaintiff:
Kyle D. Smith
Defendant:
Lt. Lane, Sgt. Hill and Ofc. Power
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powers v. USA
as 1:2012cv01392
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Marvin Powers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Edwards v. Power et al
as 2:2012cv00377
Plaintiff:
Joe Edwards
Defendant:
Mr. Captain Power, Ms. Lacks and Captain Sawyers Power
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
