Cases 1 - 10 of 116
Ruhren v. Dotson, et al.
as 1:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ruhren
Defendant:
Chadwick S. Dotson, Warden Anderson, A. Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. McCoy et al
as 1:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Karsten Allen
Defendant:
Kevin McCoy, Major Cain, Unit Manager Earnshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lassiter v. Looney et al
as 2:2023cv00681
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Lassiter, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Looney, LT. Fleming, Irving and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Star v. Winstead
as 1:2023cv01641
Petitioner:
Michael Star
Respondent:
Desha Hall Winstead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hall v. Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) et al
as 3:2023cv00765
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Edward Hall, Jr.
Defendant:
Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), The Police Department in Richmond and The Department of Juvenile Justice (Beaumont)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. Hall, et al.
as 3:2023cv00580
Plaintiff:
Xavier A. Peterson
Defendant:
Unknown, Dr. Hall, Mr. Leu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv01210
Plaintiff:
Justin Clark
Defendant:
United States of America, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Smalley v. Hall, et al.
as 1:2023cv00913
Plaintiff:
Eric R. Smalley
Defendant:
Hall, I. River and K. C. Mitchell-Tyler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Clark v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv00636
Plaintiff:
Justin Clark
Defendant:
United States of America, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Reed v. Hall et al
as 3:2023cv00247
Plaintiff:
Darnell K Reed
Defendant:
Sgt. Hall and Officer Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
