Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Conner v Piedmont Regional Jail
as 1:2021cv00464
Petitioner:
Johnnie Lee Conner
Defendant:
Piedmont Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conner v. Doe et al
as 1:2021cv00366
Defendant:
James E. Parks, Nikita B. Murphy, K. Breeding and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald T. Conner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prasad v. Chesterfield Police Dept. et al
as 3:2018cv00307
Plaintiff:
Sundari K. Prasad
Defendant:
Chesterfield Police Dept., Asina Usubaleiva, Bradford Conner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Garner-O'Conner et al
as 3:2017cv00424
Plaintiff:
Tevon Jones
Defendant:
Marilyn Garner-O'Conner, R.M. Leabaugh, Sean P. Horstman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Wells et al
as 2:2017cv00273
Plaintiff:
Wallace Johnson Wells
Defendant:
Rappahannock Regional Jail Records Dept and Mrs. O'Conner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Judy v. Conner et al
as 2:2017cv00095
Plaintiff:
William Lee Judy
Defendant:
Ian Conner and Named But Unknown Acting National Administrative Remedy Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Judy v. Williams et al
as 2:2016cv00345
Plaintiff:
William Lee Judy
Defendant:
K. Williams, Ian Conner, Several Named but Unknown Search Team Members and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hinton v. O'Conner, et al.
as 3:2014cv00253
Plaintiff:
Donald Lee Hinton
Defendant:
O'Conner, Yates, Booth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Conner v. Director, Department of Corrections of Virginia
as 2:2014cv00101
Petitioner:
Joseph Cline O'Conner
Respondent:
Director, Department of Corrections of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gary v. McDonnell, etc., et al
as 2:2012cv00099
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tyrone Gary
Defendant:
Robert F. McDonnell, City of Richmond Police, Bryan T. Worwood, City of Richmond Jail Sheriff, Michelle B. Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
