Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Varner v. Leu et al
as 3:2024cv00566
Defendant:
Warden Leu, Captain Rosencrance, Jane Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Varner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Perkins v. Virgina Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00919
Plaintiff:
Paulus Irvin Perkins
Defendant:
Virgina Department of Corrections, Virgina Department of Corrections Board, John/Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Delaney v. Doe #1 et al
as 1:2017cv00780
Plaintiff:
George Frederick Delaney
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe #1, Cynthia M. Schnurbusch, T.Y. Agnew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Waters et al
as 2:2015cv00282
Plaintiff:
Donald Wayne Waters
Defendant:
The Geo Group, Incorporated, Ed Wright, Daniel Calhoun, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Warren, Jr. et al
as 4:2014cv00028
Plaintiff:
Albert Anderson
Defendant:
D.W. Warren, Jr., Deputy M. Kingsley, Deputy Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Hearn et al
as 3:2013cv00139
Plaintiff:
Percell Williams
Defendant:
Hearn, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fain v. Rappahannock Regional Jail et al
as 3:2012cv00293
Plaintiff:
Tiarra Fain
Defendant:
Rappahannock Regional Jail, Joseph Higgs, Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith v. Mogel et al
as 1:2010cv00543
Plaintiff:
Curtis M. Keith
Defendant:
Mogel, Emron, Wayne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shabazz v. Prison Health Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00190
Plaintiff:
Muwakkil Seifullah Bey Shabazz
Defendant:
Prison Health Services, Inc., Toney King, M. Underdue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Lanteigne et al
as 1:2010cv00163
Plaintiff:
Michael Julius Lee Anderson
Defendant:
Paul J. Lanteigne, Doctor John Doe, Corporal Hendrix and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
