Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Aljazairi v. Prince William Manassas Regional Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2024cv01537
Defendant:
Prince William Manassas Regional Jail Board, Sergeant Alex C Waleisky, Sergeant Justin Feder and others
Plaintiff:
Mustafa N Aljazairi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation (Excess Force)
Drayton v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv00795
Petitioner:
Michael Drayton
Respondent:
Unknown
Defendant:
Director of the VA Dpt of Corrections/and or Warden of Keen Mountain C.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reaves v. Pugh et al
as 2:2023cv00344
Plaintiff:
Jermaine D. Reaves
Defendant:
Chad Pugh, Michael Pozeg, The Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. Virginia Department of Correction Keen Mountain Correctional Center
as 3:2020cv00886
Plaintiff:
Marvin Eduardo Luna Gomez
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Correction Keen Mountain Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobb v. Keen Mountain Correctional Center VA DOC
as 3:2015cv00214
Plaintiff:
Deon C. Cobb
Respondent:
Keen Mountain Correctional Center VA DOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allen v. Warden, Keen Mountain Correctional Center
as 1:2013cv00726
Petitioner:
Karsten Obed Allen
Respondent:
Warden Keen Mountain Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Langston v. Warden of Keen Mountain Corr. Center
as 1:2012cv00597
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Langston
Respondent:
Warden of Keen Mountain Corr. Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carter v. Warden of Keen Mountain Corr. Ctr.
as 3:2011cv00586
Petitioner:
Calvin Earl Carter
Respondent:
Warden of Keen Mountain Corr. Ctr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hurley v. Gardner et al
as 1:2007cv00272
Plaintiff:
Eric Paul Hurley
Defendant:
Officer Gardner, Clifford Keen and Chris Yates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
