Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Rivers v. Wright et al
as 2:2023cv00569
Plaintiff:
Antwoin T. Rivers
Defendant:
V. Wright, T. Moss and Sean Casey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bey v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons
as 3:2023cv00584
Petitioner:
Virgil Rivers Bey
Respondent:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Willis v. Meherrin River Regional Jail Alberta
as 2:2023cv00364
Plaintiff:
Davon Willis
Defendant:
Meherrin River Regional Jail Alberta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smalley v. Hall, et al.
as 1:2023cv00913
Plaintiff:
Eric R. Smalley
Defendant:
Hall, I. River and K. C. Mitchell-Tyler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Bey v. Leu
as 3:2023cv00055
Petitioner:
Virgil Rivers Bey
Respondent:
Warden D. Leu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Farabee v. Sheriff of Dinwiddie County et al
as 2:2022cv00279
Petitioner:
Brian D. Farabee
Respondent:
Sheriff of Dinwiddie County, Nelson Smith, Harold Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Woods v. Meherrin River Regional Jail et al
as 1:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Woods
Defendant:
Meherrin River Regional Jail, Kidd, Willshire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Jackson v. Meherrin River Regional Jail et al
as 1:2022cv00234
Plaintiff:
Karim Najee Jackson
Defendant:
Meherrin River Regional Jail, Manning, Ezell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Meherrin River Regional Jail
as 1:2022cv00174
Plaintiff:
Karim Jajee Jackson
Defendant:
Meherrin River Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Woods v. Meherrin River Regional Jail
as 1:2022cv00152
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Woods
Defendant:
Meherrin River Regional Jail, Kevin Cooper, Edmonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
