Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Cases 11 - 20 of 393
Wood v. Clarke et al
as 2:2023cv00644
Plaintiff: James R. Wood
Defendant: Harold W. Clarke, Mark Amonette, MD, Mr. Dillon, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00603
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01594
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01582
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01576
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Miller v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 2:2023cv00547
Petitioner: Frankie Marvin Miller, Jr.
Respondent: Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Monzon v. Spencer et al
as 3:2023cv00693
Plaintiff: Roman Sebastian Monzon
Defendant: Harvey Spencer, Shaw, Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. USA
as 1:2023cv01434
Petitioner: David Harris Miller
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01366
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Phoenix v. Clarke et al
as 3:2023cv00615
Plaintiff: Daniel William Phoenix
Defendant: Harold W. Clarke, Dr. Mark Amonette, Steve Herrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?