Cases 21 - 30 of 59
Gibbs et al v. Curry et al
as 3:2018cv00654
Defendant:
Brian McGowan, Eric Lau, Sentinel Resources, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Darlene Gibbs, Patrick Inscho, Isabel Deleon and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Curry v. N.W. Martin & Bros., Incorporated et al
as 3:2018cv00568
Defendant:
N.W. Martin & Bros., Incorporated and John Martin, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Luke Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Glatt et al v. Curry et al
as 4:2018cv00101
Plaintiff:
Heather Ball, John Glatt, Dashawn Hunter and others
Defendant:
Medley Capital Corporation, AWL, Inc., Medley Opportunity Fund II LP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00747
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hengle et al v. Curry et al
as 3:2018cv00100
Plaintiff:
George Hengle and Lula Williams
Defendant:
Mark Curry, American Web Loan, Inc. , AWL, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Solomon et al v. American Web Loan, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00145
Plaintiff:
Royce Solomon , Jodi Belleci , Michael Littlejohn and others
Defendant:
American Web Loan, Inc., AWL, Inc., Mark Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Curry et al
as 1:2017cv01216
Plaintiff:
Raheem L. Jones
Defendant:
Curry, Dyson, Griffen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Roberts et al
as 1:2017cv00342
Plaintiff:
Stacy Curry
Defendant:
B. J. Roberts and Ded Gray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Clarke
as 2:2017cv00166
Petitioner:
Richard Lee Curry, II
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Slavin et al v. United States Postal Service
as 3:2017cv00134
Plaintiff:
David Slavin , John Bradham , Aaron Bryant and others
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
