Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Osorio et al v. Tan Chau XO Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv00493
Plaintiff: Francisco Osorio , Matias Osorio , Jose Ivan Rodriguez Garcia and others
Defendant: Tan Chau XO Corporation, Lang Uyen Tan and Paul Chau
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Mendoza v. Cedillo Ramos et al
as 1:2014cv00439
Plaintiff: German Mendoza
Defendant: Jose Lindolfo Cedillo Ramos, Marbel Mantel, Inc. and Government Employees Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
Ramos v. J. J.'s Juice & Java, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00090
Plaintiff: Mylene Molito Ramos
Defendant: J. J.'s Juice & Java, Inc. and Rita Bhasker
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ashraf v. Duffy et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00908
Plaintiff: Zaman Ashraf
Defendant: Peter S. Duffy, Kent J. Mullen, Michael Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question Bivens-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00856
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ramos-Hernandez v. USA
as 1:2012cv00788
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Jose Marcial Ramos-Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00347
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
Ramos v. Watson
as 1:2010cv00718
Petitioner: Fredy Adiel Ramos
Respondent: Bryan Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ramirez-Ramos et al v. Donna
as 1:2009cv00541
Plaintiff: Carlos Manuel Ramirez-Ramos, Francisco Alberto Flores, Jorge Armando Guerrero-Valiente and others
Defendant: Roberto Donna
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Type: Labor Plaintiff
Ramos v. USA
as 3:2008cv00700
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Daniel M. Ramos
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?