Cases 41 - 50 of 306
Hunter v. Director of the Dept. of Corrections
as 3:2021cv00132
Respondent:
Director of the Dept. of Corrections
Petitioner:
Markeith A. Hunter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv00110
Defendant:
The United States Constitution, Hampton City Police Dept., Hampton City Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Keyon L. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Henrico County Police Dept. et al
as 3:2020cv00920
Defendant:
Henrico County Jail and Henrico County Police Dept.
Plaintiff:
Barry Thomas Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Gregory et al
as 2:2020cv00607
Defendant:
WellPath/Henrico Jail Med Staff, Henrico County Sheriff Dept. and Alisa Gregory
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lee Jackson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Williams et al
as 3:2020cv00887
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Court of Legal of the Dept. of Corrections and Tammy B. Williams
Plaintiff:
Willie Thomas Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Ross et al
as 1:2020cv01367
Defendant:
Marlon T. Fletcher, Unknown employees of the Dept of Commerce and USPTO, Daniel Swerdlow and others
Plaintiff:
Donald L. Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baker v. Ross et al
as 1:2020cv01245
Defendant:
Wilbur L. Ross, Unknownemployees of the Dept of Commerce and/or USPTO and Andrei Iancu
Plaintiff:
Donald L. Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00511
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason v. Blow et al
as 2:2020cv00501
Defendant:
Peggy Gilman, K.P. Johnson, UpCenter and others
Plaintiff:
Amy C. Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Gilmore et al
as 2:2020cv00444
Defendant:
Ofc. Cornelius Bland, Joseph Walters, QMHP - Ms. Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
