Cases 51 - 60 of 2,204
Ali v. Tatum et al
as 3:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Abir Ali
Defendant:
Esker Lee Tatum and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Amalgamated Casualty Insurance Company v. Dulles Airport Taxi, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Amalgamated Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Dulles Airport Taxi, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Amalgamated Casualty Insurance Company v. Dulles Airport Taxi, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Amalgamated Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Dulles Airport Taxi, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Tamaris (Gibraltar) Limited v. Does 1-9
as 1:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
TAMARIS (GIBRALTAR) LIMITED
Defendant:
John Does 1-9
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Jones v. Doe, et al
as 3:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Lewis Loftin Jones
Defendant:
Walgreen Co., Walgreen Co. dba Walgreens #17768, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Bradford v. Dodson et al
as 1:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Samuel Bradford
Defendant:
Dodson, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrd v. Hamilton et al
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Byrd
Defendant:
Mr. T. Hamilton, John Does and Mr. Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
