Cases 1 - 10 of 214
Aljazairi v. Prince William Manassas Regional Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2024cv01537
Defendant:
Prince William Manassas Regional Jail Board, Sergeant Alex C Waleisky, Sergeant Justin Feder and others
Plaintiff:
Mustafa N Aljazairi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation (Excess Force)
Campbell v. Stith et al
as 2:2024cv00422
Plaintiff:
Michael Earl Campbell
Defendant:
Moore, SGT Evens and LT Stith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newton v. G.E.O Group, Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00413
Defendant:
G.E.O Group, Inc, C. O. Mason, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Nicholas Newton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgess v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 2:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Earl Dushawn Burgess
Defendant:
Virginia Commonwealth of and Virginia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Braswell v. Ruby
as 4:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Danny Earl Braswell
Defendant:
Dr. Ruby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elder v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
as 2:2023cv00466
Plaintiff:
Earl Raymond Elder
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Combs v. Unknown
as 3:2023cv00601
Plaintiff:
Earl Nathaniel Combs, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Combs v. Unknown
as 3:2023cv00553
Petitioner:
Earl Combs, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kuzminski v. Clark et al
as 1:2023cv01142
Petitioner:
Michael Robert Kuzminski
Respondent:
Harold Clark, Earles and O'Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Combs v. Unknown
as 3:2023cv00504
Petitioner:
Earl Combs, Jr.
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
