Cases 11 - 20 of 271
Watson v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00482
Petitioner:
Kevin A. Watson
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00456
Petitioner:
Terell Moore
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00484
Petitioner:
Derrick A. Edwards
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sayers v. Clark
as 7:2023cv00561
Petitioner:
Jerry David Sayers
Respondent:
Harold W. Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Saunders v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00416
Petitioner:
Jamal Kemo Saunders and Forever Al-Mani Hamilton
Respondent:
Director Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonds v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00415
Petitioner:
Durwin Evant Bonds, Jr.
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chambliss v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00447
Petitioner:
Raheem Chambliss
Respondent:
Lt. Bray, Sheriff Milum and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. Harold W. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00403
Petitioner:
Nicholas Alan Jenkins
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Buchanan County Circuit Court and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00357
Petitioner:
Christopher E. Wilson
Respondent:
Unknown and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Annarelli v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00308
Petitioner:
David J. Annarelli
Respondent:
Harold Clarke and Warden Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
