Cases 221 - 230 of 2,242
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Branham v. City Of Lynchburg et al
as 6:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
George P. Branham, Jr.
Defendant:
City Of Lynchburg and Blue Ridge Regional Jail Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santiago v. Zudima, Police Chief et al
as 6:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Timothy Zachariah Santiago
Defendant:
Ryan Zudima, Police Chief, Sargent Burns and Elsa Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Payton et al v. Guallart et al
as 3:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Claire Payton and Jonathan Katz
Defendant:
Liana Arias de Velasco Guallart and Christopher Tschappatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Board Of Supervisors Of Alleghany County v. Kern
as 7:2022cv00424
Plaintiff:
Board Of Supervisors Of Alleghany County
Defendant:
Donnie T.A.M Kern
Huffman v. The Wise County Housing Authority et al
as 2:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
Jullian Huffman
Defendant:
The Wise County Housing Authority and Cindi L. Smoot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Adams et al v. Houff et al
as 5:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Karen Susan Adams, Kimberly Wood, Briana Wood and others
Defendant:
Judge W. Dale Houff and Michael Artone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
