Cases 21 - 30 of 73
Meeks v. The City of Danville et al
as 4:2020cv00029
Defendant:
John Pulley, The City of Danville, Jacob Amos and others
Plaintiff:
Eldridge Roosevelt Meeks, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neese v. Barr et al
as 7:2020cv00260
Defendant:
Thomas T. Cullen, Executive Office for United States Attorneys, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Ashley Brooke Neese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Thorpe et al v. Virginia Department Of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv00007
Defendant:
Denise Malone, A. David Robinson, Tori Raiford and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cottrell, Brian Cavitt, Peter Mukuria and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv00211
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Board of Visitors of Virginia Military Institute et al
as 7:2020cv00058
Defendant:
Board of Visitors of Virginia Military Institute, Ryan A. Hoops, Brayden A. Carver and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 - Title IX of the Education Amendment of 1972
Lentz v. Goodwin et al
as 5:2020cv00002
Defendant:
William Chapman Goodwin, Charles Ricketts and Paul A. Dryer
Plaintiff:
Karl Lentz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00786
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Tilson v. Humphrey et al
as 5:2019cv00033
Defendant:
Sonya Randall Edwards, Bradford Barker, Donna Reynolds and others
Plaintiff:
Jared Tilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant v. Harris et al
as 6:2019cv00017
Petitioner:
William Lee Grant, II
Respondent:
Joint Chiefs of Staff and Gregory K. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Grant v. Harris et al
as 5:2019cv00024
Respondent:
AUSA Gregory K. Harris and Department of Defense
Petitioner:
William Lee Grant, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
