Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 Uniformed Services Employment & Re-employment Rights Act - USERRA
Evans v. The City of Lynchburg et al
as 6:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Herman Tracy Evans
Defendant:
The City of Lynchburg, LPD Officer Seth Reed and LPD Officer Jacob Daniel William
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scarborough v. Daniel et al
as 5:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
Christie Scarborough
Defendant:
Mary Daniel, Nicholas Hager and Frederick County of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Campbell et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2022cv00054
Plaintiff:
Brittany Campbell, Kimilla Campbell and Isaiah Campbell
Defendant:
Melissa Smith, Danielle Nicholson, Brianna Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2021cv00596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Clark v. Liberty University, Inc.
as 6:2020cv00058
Defendant:
Liberty University, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Daniel Conrad Clark
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Harris v. Kessler et al
as 3:2019cv00046
Defendant:
Matthew Parrot, Elliot Kline, East Coast Knights of The Ku Klux Klan and others
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Armstrong v. Hutcheson et al
as 5:2019cv00040
Defendant:
Daniel L. Conley, Thomas James, Kristy Marie Roadcap and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gupta v. Northam et al
as 6:2019cv00015
Plaintiff:
Alisha Gupta
Defendant:
Dick Roberts, Daniel Carey, Ralph Northam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
