Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Gary-Bey v. United States Federal Corporation et al
as 7:2024cv00281
Petitioner:
Gregory Tyrone Gary-Bey
Respondent:
United States Federal Corporation and Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hudson v. Back
as 7:2024cv00084
Petitioner:
Gary Matthew Hudson
Respondent:
Warden Back
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. USA
as 3:2024cv81547
Petitioner:
Gary Christopher Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rimmer v. USA
as 3:2024cv81546
Petitioner:
Gary Lee Rimmer
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rimmer v. Schneider et al
as 7:2023cv00781
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Rimmer
Defendant:
Michael Schneider, Hally Vradenburgh, Esq. and T. Brotta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunley v. Bilter, et al
as 7:2023cv00702
Plaintiff:
Gary Nunley
Defendant:
Unknown, Johny Bilter, Trish McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Stuart et al
as 7:2023cv00586
Plaintiff:
Larry Young, Jr.
Defendant:
Dean Stuart, Eric Pluta, Michael Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wall v. Kiser et al
as 7:2023cv00467
Plaintiff:
Gary Wall
Defendant:
Lt. J. Kiser, A. Gallihar, W. Swiney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johns v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
Lameek Shalam Johns
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Harold Clarke, A. David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. Warden
as 7:2023cv00376
Petitioner:
Gary A. Hinton
Respondent:
Unknown and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
